Breadcrumbs NavigationHome > News & Publications > News and Communications > News > CRISP AMI Results Show No Difference in Infarct Size Between IABC and Standard of Care in Patients with Acute Heart Attacks
CRISP AMI Results Show No Difference in Infarct Size Between IABC and Standard of Care in Patients with Acute Heart Attacks
Inserting intra-aortic balloon pumps prior to angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) does not reduce the scope of heart muscle damage, a condition referred to as infarct size, according to a new study conducted by Duke University Medical Center researchers.
The intra-aortic balloon pump works by increasing the blood supply to the heart, which reduces the heart’s workload.
According to Manesh Patel, MD, the principal investigator and cardiologist at the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), “animal studies had suggested that inserting a balloon pump before opening the vessel would reduce the heart’s workload and by doing so, could potentially reduce infarct size. When we tested this observation in humans, we did not show an infarct reduction.”
CRISP AMI was a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial that enrolled patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without shock within six hours of chest pain onset and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Of the 337 patients enrolled, 161 were randomized to receive intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) prior to primary PCI, and 176 to the standard of care (SOC), which is primary PCI without IABC support.
The mean infarct size, measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, was not significantly different between the IABC and SOC groups (42.1 percent vs. 37.5 percent).
At 30 days, major bleeding or transfusion occurred in five (3.1 percent) of the IABC patients versus three (1.7 percent) of SOC patients.
Major vascular complications occurred in seven (4.3 percent) of the IABC patients, versus two (1.1 percent) of the SOC patients. treated with IABC compared to SOC.
By six months, death occurred in three (1.9 percent) in the IABC group and nine (5.2 percent) in the SOC group.
While the study was not set up to report clinical events, the researchers say the results are interesting because they offer unique insight into treating AMI patients.
“The most striking observation is the excellent overall outcome for the highest-risk patients within the context of this trial,” says E. Magnus Ohman, MD, a co-investigator and cardiologist at DCRI. “The IABC group had less than five percent mortality. It’s hard to improve that. We’ve gotten very good at treating AMI patients.”
Acute myocardial infarction patients represent nearly half of the approximately 1.5 million annual hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes in the U.S. Acute mortality risk is between 6 percent and 15 percent; one-year mortality is estimated at 38 percent for women and 25 percent for men.
Ohman says it’s also important to note that 15 of the patients in the standard of care group crossed over to receive IABC -- five prior to PCI and 10 after.
“While routine use of IABC is not recommended, physicians should be vigilant about identifying patients who are at risk for rapid deterioration and may benefit from counterpulsation,” says Patel.
Funding for CRISP AMI was provided by Maquet / Datascope.
Manesh Patel, MD, receives research grants and support from Maquet / Datascope.
About This Article
Published: Aug. 30, 2011
Updated: Aug. 30, 2011
Reporters & producers can visit Duke Medicine News and Communications for contact information.